For revision, not replacement
The system does not write the book for you. It helps you see where the draft is confusing, inconsistent, underpowered, or not yet submission-ready.
AI manuscript review
Editorial Conductor reviews your manuscript chapter by chapter with specialist agents for continuity, structure, prose, voice, theme, emotional truth, and market readiness.
Built for revision
Ten editorial agents, not one generic critique pass.
Series-bible-aware continuity checks for novels and ongoing worlds.
Ranked action brief so you know what to revise first.
Credits are only charged after a successful analysis.
The system does not write the book for you. It helps you see where the draft is confusing, inconsistent, underpowered, or not yet submission-ready.
Each finding is tied back to the chapter under review, so you can move from broad editorial diagnosis to concrete revision work.
The Conductor resolves competing agent notes into a prioritized brief with P0, P1, and P2 actions.
Questions writers ask
Yes. Editorial Conductor reviews fiction manuscripts by splitting the job into specialist editorial lenses, then synthesizing the results into one action plan.
No. It is best used before a human edit, between revision passes, or when you need structured feedback before paying for professional editorial time.
Yes. Full manuscripts are processed chapter by chapter. Each chapter uses one credit.
Editorial Conductor
Ask me anything
Powered by Claude · Editorial Conductor AI